November 7, 2011 § Leave a comment

Like Ferdinand Saussure, the Chinese scholar Ernest Fenallosa believed that in language there are no concrete objects outside a web of correlating meaning. Fenallosa based his ideas on a close study of nature: in nature no “thing” exists in isolation because things cannot be removed from their relationships, represented in language by verbs (in order to exist a thing must be the object or subject of a successive or continuous action).

I don’t know for how long I’ve tried to make myself a noun. Nouns are endings, deaths, and I have felt dead. Nouns are by nature distant. From this day forward, I act, like a verb: I will construct objects and subjects, become an impromptu object or subject, correlate in turn to objects and subjects via other verbs. Nouns drop in and out of the lexicon, they are replaced and forgotten as newer words supplant their meanings. Verbs, the core of action, the core of thought, even supplanted figure into other words, their relations (the Latin jacere, “to throw”: eject, subject, object, abject, etc).

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

What’s this?

You are currently reading at paorta-kremvax conglomerate.

meta

%d bloggers like this: